Zones of conceptualisation in scientific papers: a window to negative and speculative statements

Maria Liakata

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Proceeding (Non-Journal item)

Abstract

In view of the increasing need to facilitate processing the content of scientific papers, we present an annotation scheme for annotating full papers with zones of conceptualisation, reflecting the information structure and knowledge types which constitute a scientific investigation. The latter are the Core Scientific Concepts (CoreSCs) and include Hypothesis, Motivation, Goal, Object, Background, Method, Experiment, Model, Observation, Result and Conclusion. The CoreSC scheme has been used to annotate a corpus of 265 full papers in physical chemistry and biochemistry and we are currently automating the recognition of CoreSCs in papers. We discuss how the CoreSC scheme relates to other views of scientific papers and indeed how the former could be used to help identify negation and speculation in scientific texts.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNeSp-NLP '10: Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing
EditorsRoser Morante, Caroline Sporleder
PublisherAssociation for Computational Linguistics
Pages1-4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • text analysis
  • text processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zones of conceptualisation in scientific papers: a window to negative and speculative statements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this