TY - JOUR
T1 - Making the invisible, visible
T2 - Older lesbian, gay and bisexual victim-survivors’ “lived experiences” of domestic abuse
AU - Wydall, Sarah
AU - Zerk, Rebecca
AU - Freeman, Elize
N1 - Researchers from the Dewis Choice initiative were awarded funding from the National Community Fund to raise awareness about older victims-survivors of DA. The authors would like to extend a special thanks to the Director, Christian Gordine, and his film crew for their ongoing commitment to empowering older LGBTQ+ victims and ensure their voices are heard. The authors would also like to thank David Cowsill and Tom Chapman for their insights into the emerging themes from the focus groups and their input into the development of “Do You See Me?” We would also like to thank Emeritus Professor Alan Clarke for his thoughtful observations and the reviewers for their very supportive and encouraging feedback. The authors also want to thank all the stakeholder groups involved especially the 14 LGBTQ participants who shared their lived experiences of DA with us. The authors’ sincere appreciation is extended to the four LGB collaborators who gave so much of their time, experiential knowledge and creativity in co-producing the film. The film “Do You See Me?” by the Dewis Choice Initiative can be accessed via the Dewis Choice YouTube channel.
This study is funded by the National Lottery Community Fund.
PY - 2023/7/18
Y1 - 2023/7/18
N2 - PurposeThis paper aims to examine the use of coproduction to create a film “Do You See Me?”, to amplify the voices of a “hard to reach” group: older lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) victim-survivors of domestic abuse (DA).Design/methodology/approachQualitative methods were used as part of the co-production, which included two practitioner focus groups and 14 narrative interviews with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning persons or the community (LGBTQ+) victim-survivors.FindingsDespite differences in gender, sexualities, roles and “lived experiences” across stakeholders, there was a shared aim to ensure victim-survivors had a sense of ownership in this endeavour. Consequently, a positive reciprocity existed that helped to foster effective communication, allow for capacity building and subsequent knowledge exchange. The collaboration produced a nuanced meta-narrative making visible the “lived experiences” of LGB victim-survivors’ perceptions of perpetrator behaviours.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is original in two ways, firstly, providing insights into the “lived experiences” of an invisible group; older LGBTQ+ victim-survivors, and secondly, in involving them in the co-production of a film. The paper aims to reveal how interdependencies that developed between stakeholders helped to disrupt understandings, develop new ways of knowing and build levels of trust. Group interactions helped to dismantle hierarchies, so those with experiential knowledge: the survivors, had greater control throughout the research process. The paper is significant in providing a critical reflection on the ethical, methodological and resource challenges involved in co-production. It also makes recommendations for researchers and funders about the value of using co-production as a method to engage with hard-to-reach groups.
AB - PurposeThis paper aims to examine the use of coproduction to create a film “Do You See Me?”, to amplify the voices of a “hard to reach” group: older lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) victim-survivors of domestic abuse (DA).Design/methodology/approachQualitative methods were used as part of the co-production, which included two practitioner focus groups and 14 narrative interviews with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning persons or the community (LGBTQ+) victim-survivors.FindingsDespite differences in gender, sexualities, roles and “lived experiences” across stakeholders, there was a shared aim to ensure victim-survivors had a sense of ownership in this endeavour. Consequently, a positive reciprocity existed that helped to foster effective communication, allow for capacity building and subsequent knowledge exchange. The collaboration produced a nuanced meta-narrative making visible the “lived experiences” of LGB victim-survivors’ perceptions of perpetrator behaviours.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is original in two ways, firstly, providing insights into the “lived experiences” of an invisible group; older LGBTQ+ victim-survivors, and secondly, in involving them in the co-production of a film. The paper aims to reveal how interdependencies that developed between stakeholders helped to disrupt understandings, develop new ways of knowing and build levels of trust. Group interactions helped to dismantle hierarchies, so those with experiential knowledge: the survivors, had greater control throughout the research process. The paper is significant in providing a critical reflection on the ethical, methodological and resource challenges involved in co-production. It also makes recommendations for researchers and funders about the value of using co-production as a method to engage with hard-to-reach groups.
KW - Age
KW - Choice
KW - Co-production
KW - Domestic abuse
KW - Heteronormative
KW - Inclusion
KW - LGBTQ+
KW - “Lived experiences”
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163687699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JAP-10-2022-0020
DO - 10.1108/JAP-10-2022-0020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163687699
SN - 1466-8203
VL - 25
SP - 167
EP - 185
JO - Journal of Adult Protection
JF - Journal of Adult Protection
IS - 3
ER -