TY - JOUR
T1 - Impacts of abiotic stresses on the physiology and metabolism of cool-season grasses
T2 - A review
AU - Loka, Dimitra
AU - Harper, John
AU - Humphreys, Michael
AU - Gasior, Dagmara
AU - Wootton-Beard, Peter
AU - Gwynn-Jones, Dylan
AU - Scullion, John
AU - Doonan, John
AU - Kingston-Smith, Alison
AU - Dodd, Rosalind
AU - Wang, Jinyang
AU - Chadwick, David R.
AU - Hill, Paul
AU - Jones, Davey L.
AU - Mills, Gina
AU - Hayes, Felicity
AU - Robinson, David
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Welsh Government and Higher Education Funding Council for Wales through the Sêr Cymru National Research Network for Low Carbon, Energy, and Environment and by BBSRC (BBS/E/W/10964A01; BBS/E/W/0012843D).
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Welsh Government and Higher Education Funding Council for Wales through the S?r Cymru National Research Network for Low Carbon, Energy, and Environment and by BBSRC (BBS/E/W/10964A01; BBS/E/W/0012843D).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Food and Energy Security published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. and the Association of Applied Biologists.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Grasslands cover more than 70% of the world's agricultural land playing a pivotal role in global food security, economy, and ecology due to their flexibility and functionality. Climate change, characterized by changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, and by increased levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, is anticipated to increase both the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as drought, heat waves, and flooding. Potentially, climate change could severely compromise future forage crop production and should be considered a direct threat to food security. This review aimed to summarize our current understanding of the physiological and metabolic responses of temperate grasses to those abiotic stresses associated with climate change. Primarily, substantial decreases in photosynthetic rates of cool‐season grasses occur as a result of high temperatures, water‐deficit or water‐excess, and elevated ozone, but not CO2 concentrations. Those decreases are usually attributed to stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations. Additionally, while membrane instability and reactive oxygen species production was a common feature of the abiotic stress response, total antioxidant capacity showed a stress‐specific response. Furthermore, climate change‐related stresses altered carbohydrate partitioning, with implications for biomass production. While water‐deficit stress, increased CO2, and ozone concentrations resulted in higher carbohydrate content, the opposite occurred under conditions of heat stress and flooding. The extent of damage is greatly dependent on location, as well as the type and intensity of stress. Fortunately, temperate forage grass species are highly heterogeneous. Consequently, through intra‐ and in particular inter‐specific plant hybridization (e.g., Festuca x Lolium hybrids) new opportunities are available to harness, within single genotypes, gene combinations capable of combating climate change
AB - Grasslands cover more than 70% of the world's agricultural land playing a pivotal role in global food security, economy, and ecology due to their flexibility and functionality. Climate change, characterized by changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, and by increased levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, is anticipated to increase both the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as drought, heat waves, and flooding. Potentially, climate change could severely compromise future forage crop production and should be considered a direct threat to food security. This review aimed to summarize our current understanding of the physiological and metabolic responses of temperate grasses to those abiotic stresses associated with climate change. Primarily, substantial decreases in photosynthetic rates of cool‐season grasses occur as a result of high temperatures, water‐deficit or water‐excess, and elevated ozone, but not CO2 concentrations. Those decreases are usually attributed to stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations. Additionally, while membrane instability and reactive oxygen species production was a common feature of the abiotic stress response, total antioxidant capacity showed a stress‐specific response. Furthermore, climate change‐related stresses altered carbohydrate partitioning, with implications for biomass production. While water‐deficit stress, increased CO2, and ozone concentrations resulted in higher carbohydrate content, the opposite occurred under conditions of heat stress and flooding. The extent of damage is greatly dependent on location, as well as the type and intensity of stress. Fortunately, temperate forage grass species are highly heterogeneous. Consequently, through intra‐ and in particular inter‐specific plant hybridization (e.g., Festuca x Lolium hybrids) new opportunities are available to harness, within single genotypes, gene combinations capable of combating climate change
KW - abiotic stresses
KW - climate change
KW - cool-season grasses
KW - metabolism
KW - physiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054561618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/fes3.152
DO - 10.1002/fes3.152
M3 - Review Article
SN - 2048-3694
VL - 8
JO - Food and Energy Security
JF - Food and Energy Security
IS - 1
M1 - e00152
ER -