Abstract
Despite a select group of urban centres generating a disproportionate amount of global economic output, significant attention is being devoted to the impact of urban-economic processes on interstitial spaces lying between metropolitan areas. Nevertheless, there remains a noticeable silence in city-region debate concerning how rural spaces are conceptualised, governed and represented. In this paper we draw on recent city-region developments in England and Wales to suggest a paralysis of city-region policymaking has ensued from policy elites constantly swaying between a spatially-selective, city-first, agglomeration perspective on city-regionalism and a spatially-inclusive, region-first, scalar approach which fragments and divides territorial space along historical lines. In
the final part we provide a typology of functionally dominant city-region constructs which we suggest offers a way out from the paralysis that currently grips city-region policymaking.
the final part we provide a typology of functionally dominant city-region constructs which we suggest offers a way out from the paralysis that currently grips city-region policymaking.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1113-1133 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Urban Studies |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 07 May 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 May 2015 |
Keywords
- city-region
- functional areas
- metropolis
- rural space
- spatial planning
- subnational governance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Governing beyond the metropolis: Placing the rural in city-region development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Jesse Heley
Person: Teaching And Research